• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SMSF Loan Experts

It's not complicated when it's done right
Speak to one of our SMSF Loan specialists today 1300 781 680
  • Call 1300 781 680
  • Home
  • Is This You?
    • I Don’t Have An SMSF, but I’d Like One
    • I Have A SMSF Already
  • How We Help
    • Residential SMSF Loans
    • Commercial SMSF Loans
    • SMSF Setup
    • SMSF Refinance
    • SMSF Lending Strategy
    • Bad Credit SMSF Loans
    • NDIS Property Investment
    • One-part contract
  • Client Reviews
  • FAQs
  • News
  • About
  • Enquire Now
You are here: Home / Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements / Why proposed SMSF lending changes are misplaced

8 years ago, we saw the need in a growing market for lending experts who specialise in SMSF. Our team now combines years of experience through every aspect of self-managed super funds. Together, we organise more limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA or SMSF loans) in a week than most other brokers or bank branches in a year. Here we share some of our insights as well as SMSF news with you.

Our expertise has been sought by and seen in Australian Broker, the Herald Sun, Money and Mamamia.

Make sure you get the right SMSF lending advice. Send us a message or call SMSF Loan Experts on 1300 781 680.

SMSF Lending Restrictions

Why proposed SMSF lending changes are misplaced

April 26, 2017 By Yannick Ieko

Property affordability is high on the political agenda nowadays and by the sound of things, Mr Shorten is not going to let facts get in the way of a bit of useless class warfare for as long as he’s seen by his base as hurting the “wealthy”. Unless of course he’s trying to please some influential lobbies such as industry superannuation funds who have been bleeding business to SMSFs without finding any commercial answer for such a long time? Either way, he allowed himself some very uneducated comments.

Property through SMSF

Restricting SMSF lending

Mr Shorten stated among other non sense that the real estate market was overheated, partly because of “wealthy Self Managed super funds” and therefore a ban on SMSF loans would help cool it down (afr.com/news/politics/labor-escalates-housing-war-with-smsf-ban-proposal-20170420-gvoqme).

He did not feel the need, perhaps because he does not understand it, to detail that the overheating only affects a select number of postcodes in Sydney and Melbourne and that the rest of the country can certainly do with willing buyers (ask anyone in Perth if they need the market to cool down…).

Negative gearing & SMSF lending

It’s also worth noting an interesting discrepancy between how he addresses negative gearing and SMSF lending. According to Mr Shorten both are causing an overheated real estate market but one (negative gearing) he will restrict to new dwelling to stimulate new supply to the market, while the other (SMSF loans) he will abolish altogether. It’s a strange to say the least – would not the same remedy work for both if the concern was indeed what he claims it is?

A few facts and thoughts about SMSF gearing that Mr Shorten may have overlooked

According to the ATO (https://www.ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Super-statistics/SMSF/Self-managed-super-fund-quarterly-statistical-report—June-2016/), as of June 2016, SMSFs own $68.5 million worth of commercial properties and 24.3 millions of residential properties securing 21.8 million worth of loans.

That’s an overall 23.52% loan to value ratio, which hardly sounds like a debt driven investment trend.
Based on my experience organizing LRBAs for SMSF, the “wealthy” argument from Mr Shorten might be politically rewarding but is the most incorrect one all the same, as the wealthier the SMSF, the lower the lending.

Small balance SMSF trustees consistently are the one seeking higher loan to value ratio SMSF loans, while medium size balance SMSF tend to gear less and really wealthy SMSF very little or not at all.
A ban on SMSF loan will mostly hurt smaller funds and let the wealthy ones continue without much disturbance. It’s sadly ironic that a measure presented to curb the rich’s bad behavior is going to mostly hurt the suburban mums and dads who are trying hard not to end up on the pension.

The questionable market impact of SMSF lending restrictions

The above figures may seem like big numbers but they need to be put in perspective. According to the ABS (abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6416.0), the total value of residential properties in Australia was 6,438,537.30 millions as of December 2016. That means that SMSF currently own 0.038% of properties in Australia.

Considering the proposed ban on lending would only affect, out of that tiny percentage, only those needing SMSF loans, it’s questionable at best how much cooling it will provide to the market. You would also have noted that by and large, most of the SMSF direct property ownership is through commercial SMSF properties, a market which does not really need any cooling to start with.

Many small business owners purchase their premises through their SMSF to free cash in their business which can subsequently be used to invest in the said business. At a time when it is extremely difficult for these businesses to raise funds, this ban on borrowing could cool down small non mining business investment. That would be a real shame since we constantly hear the reserve bank impatiently whining about how there is not enough of it.

Eventually, Australia may learn the hard way that trying to manipulate the market through regulatory changes may have unpredictable, uncontrollable and undesirable consequences. One should be careful about what one is wishing for. A solid real estate market is at the heart of the economic stability of this country and should not be taken for granted.

Filed Under: Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements, SMSF Property Investment

Primary Sidebar

Get in Touch

Have a question about SMSF Lending that you'd like answered? We'd love to hear from you. Send us a message or call us directly on 1300 781 680.







    Please send me important SMSF updates.

    Featured On

    Financial Review
    Business Acumen Magazine

    seven network logo
    Talking business podcast

    Australian Property Investor
    your life choices

    ultra 106five

    Recent Posts

    housing-increase

    What Does the Housing Price Increase Mean for the Future?

    There has been a residential property price boom across Australia over the last 12 to 18 months. According to the latest figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian property prices grew by a whopping 23.7% in 2021. This is the third-largest annual increase on record. The highest was in 1950 when prices doubled after […]

    super-splitting

    How Your Relationship Status Can Affect Your SMSF

    If you have a self-managed super fund (SMSF), it’s important to understand the impact a relationship breakdown can have on your assets. Superannuation assets are considered to be property under the provisions of the Family Law Act, but they are treated differently from other assets. SMSF and divorce Unlike most other types of assets, super […]

    Your Questions

    Do you have a topic or question around SMSF Lending you'd like us to write about? You can simply send us a message letting us know what you'd like to hear from us on, and we'll do our best to address your question or topic in our upcoming posts.







    Download Our Investing in Property Inside an SMSF Guide

    The ultimate guide for anyone thinking about buying
    property inside their super fund including:
    The basics,
    the technical aspects,
    case study &
    how we help

    Marketing by



    ActiveCampaign

    Footer

    Quick Find Index

    SMSF Property Loans
    SMSF Commercial Loans
    Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements – LRBA
    Which Banks Give Loans To SMSF
    SMSF Setup
    Blog
    Sitemap

    Sydney | Melbourne

    Melbourne Office

    Suite 2, 54 Davis Avenue
    South Yarra VICTORIA 314

    1300 781 680

    Featured On

    Financial Review
    Business Acumen Magazine
    seven network logo
    Why proposed SMSF lending changes are misplaced
    Australian Property Investor

    YYJ Pty Ltd, ABN 20 119 205 999, T/A smsfloanexperts.com.au Australian Credit Licence: 530508. Copyright © 2022 smsfloanexperts.com.au | Privacy | Website Design by Matt Angel
    • Call 1300 781 680
    • Home
    • Is This You?
      • I Don’t Have An SMSF, but I’d Like One
      • I Have A SMSF Already
      • Back
    • How We Help
      • Residential SMSF Loans
      • Commercial SMSF Loans
      • SMSF Setup
      • SMSF Refinance
      • SMSF Lending Strategy
      • Bad Credit SMSF Loans
      • NDIS Property Investment
      • One-part contract
      • Back
    • Client Reviews
    • FAQs
    • News
    • About
    • Enquire Now